Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Wakefield Metropolitan District Council · 2023 rating list

UNIT 28A, LANGTHWAITE GRANGE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, SOUTH KIRKBY, WF9 3NR

Warehouse and premises Decided 26 November 2025 CHG101119993 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV · 2023 list£46,000
Ratepayer sought£32,500
VO conceded first£40,000−13% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£40,000from 26 Nov 2025

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 5 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Unit 28A, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR). Every property is listed below.

The 5 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Unit 35 and Unit 37, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR£65,500£48,500£55,000Dismissed
Unit 28, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR£111,000£101,000£112,000Allowed in part
Unit 28A, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NRThis appeal£46,000£32,500£40,000Dismissed
Unit 34D, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR£71,000£45,750£53,000Dismissed
Unit 19C & D, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3AP£37,750£25,000£28,750Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

Appellants argued for reduced tone of £35-37.50/m2 based on rental evidence from units on the industrial estate, particularly a lease on Unit 19C & D. The Tribunal found the Valuation Officer's evidence more persuasive, particularly Unit 2 Power Park which was a similar size unit on a comparable rural industrial estate with rent agreed close to the valuation date. The rents relied upon by the Appellant were too remote from the valuation date and required adjustment, making them less reliable. The current assessments for Units 35 and 37 and Unit 34D were found to be reasonable and appeals were dismissed without change.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Ernest Cooper Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
12 November 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Wakefield Metropolitan District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.