383 SYKES ROAD, SL1 4SP
Warehouse and premises Decided 31 July 2025 CHG101113851 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited/Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the rateable value of £22,500 (based on £130 per m²) for a warehouse with offices on Sykes Road, Slough, arguing for a reduction to £19,000 (£110 per m²) based on rental evidence. The tribunal found the disputed rental evidence analysed differently by the parties due to different measurement methods and lease terms, with some comparables on internal repairing leases rather than full insuring and repairing leases. The tribunal accepted that £22,500 was unreasonable but did not accept the appellant's proposed reduction to £19,000, instead determining that the rental evidence supported a price of £125 per m² with a rateable value of £21,750, allowing the appeal in part.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Freight Merchandising Services, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
- Hearing
- 15 July 2025
Similar decisions
- 284, ABERDEEN AVENUE, SL1 4HG — Dismissed, 28 Nov 2025
- 955, YEOVIL ROAD, SL1 4NH — Dismissed, 4 Sept 2025
- UNIT 15, BRITANNIA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, POYLE ROAD, COLNBROOK, COLNBROOK, SL3 0EL — Allowed in part, 14 Aug 2025
- BUILDING 453, SLOUGH TRADE PARK 97, FARNHAM ROAD, SL1 4UN — Allowed, 31 Jul 2025
All decisions in Slough Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.