Kitchen Unit, 69 Steward Street, B18 7AF
Ground floor Café Decided 15 May 2024 CHG101117056 Kyle Tidey
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the rateable value of £18,750 (£400/m² for 47m²) was excessive and proposed a reduction to £12,600, citing comparable properties in the area with lower price/m² values and arguing the subject property was in a poor industrial area compared to the jewellery quarter. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellant's comparable properties were not sufficiently similar (different use types and valuation bases), the subject property's actual rental agreement was a licence to occupy (given limited weight), and the Valuation Officer's comparable rental evidence from properties in Warstone Mews close to the antecedent valuation date and valued on the same basis provided more reliable evidence of the £400/m² tone.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Resolve Law Group, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 26 April 2024
Similar decisions
- Wharfside Leisure Complex, 13 Lifford Lane, B30 3JH — Dismissed, 7 Jul 2026
- Itihaas, 18 Fleet Street, B3 1JL — Allowed in part, 27 Jun 2025
- Slug And Lettuce, 17 Birmingham Road, B72 1QA — Dismissed, 16 May 2025
- Ian Hazel Funerals, 274 Lichfield Road, B74 2UH — Allowed in part, 4 Dec 2024
All decisions in Birmingham City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.