Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Newcastle City Council · 2023 rating list

Office, 1-3 Hotspur Way, NE1 7XR

Shop and premises Decided 13 July 2026 CHG101119193 Dunlop Heywood

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV · 2023 list£155,000
Ratepayer sought£99,000
VO conceded first£105,000−32% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£155,000from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (1-3 HOTSPUR WAY, NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, NE1 7XR). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
10 DOUGLAS WAY, NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, NE1 7XW£85,000£44,000£85,000Dismissed
1B CHEVY CHASE, NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, NE1 7XP£97,000£59,000£97,000Dismissed
1-3 HOTSPUR WAY, NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, NE1 7XRThis appeal£155,000£99,000£155,000Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the Zone A prices for three retail units in Eldon Square Shopping Centre, proposing £700-£850 per m2 based on rental evidence which they argued supported lower valuations than the listed £1,400 per m2. The Valuation Officer had already reduced the price to £950 per m2 before the tribunal hearing. The tribunal considered rental evidence ranging from £714 to £1,280 per m2, giving limited weight to turnover and occupancy-cost deals as they do not conform with the rating hypothesis. The tribunal found the £950 per m2 price reasonable given the subject properties' central location within the shopping centre, consistent with agreed prices for adjacent malls and supported by sufficient rental evidence at or above that level.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was INTU ELDON SQUARE LTD, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
16 June 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in Newcastle City Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.