Tribunals · Eastbourne Borough Council · 2023 rating list

3-5 Bolton Road, BN21 3JU

Restaurant and premises Decided 6 August 2025 CHG101121744

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£65,500£275/m²
Ratepayer sought£40,000
VO conceded first£60,000−8% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£60,000£250/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant (property owner) argued the RV of £60,000 was too high and unaffordable, contending he could not find a tenant at that level, citing marketing at £45,000 and a failed offer at £30,000-£45,000. The tribunal found the best evidence was a comparable restaurant next door let at £35,000 per annum (£247.44 psm), which when analysed supported the RV of £60,000 (£250 psm) in line with nearby comparable properties. No evidence was provided to support a reduction from the £250 psm rate.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
7 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Eastbourne Borough Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.