1, ASCOT ROAD, TW14 8QH
Warehouse and premises Decided 8 April 2026 CHG101128498 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited/Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants (Pop Air Ltd and Expeditors International (UK) Limited) challenged rateable values based on an unadjusted base rate of £130 psm, proposing £100 psm. The tribunal examined comparable evidence including rental analysis from Heathrow Logistics Park properties, Skyline Business Park, and other warehouse assessments in the locality. The tribunal found the original £130 psm was unreasonable and adopted £110 psm as the appropriate tone, supported by rental evidence, prior tribunal decisions on adjacent units at the same business park, and settlements of comparable properties at similar rates.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Pop Air Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 23 March 2026
Similar decisions
- 145, Faggs Road, TW14 0NQ — Allowed in part, 6 May 2026
- UNIT 2, HEATHROW LOGISTICS PARK, BEDFONT ROAD, TW14 8EE — Allowed in part, 8 Apr 2026
- UNIT 2, HEATHROW LOGISTICS PARK, BEDFONT ROAD, TW14 8EE — Allowed in part, 8 Apr 2026
- 10 Pulborough Way, TW4 6DE — Allowed, 29 Oct 2025
All decisions in London Borough of Hounslow · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.