Tribunals · Hartlepool Borough Council · 2017 rating list

12-25 The Front, Seaton Carew, TS25 1BS

Amusement arcade and premises Decided 2 October 2024 CHG101146339 Bell & Bell

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£128,000
Ratepayer sought£62,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£107,000£50/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the appeal property should be valued as a Family Entertainment Centre rather than an amusement arcade, and that the valuation failed to account for its poorer location compared to comparable properties, resulting in a proposed RV of £62,500. The tribunal agreed the property was in a poorer location than comparables but rejected the appellant's proposed rate of £35.00/m², instead adopting a reduced rate of £50.00/m² with allowances for unit split and quantum, resulting in a confirmed RV of £107,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Rubicon Pastimes Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, tone_of_list_comparables, Expert report
Hearing
4 September 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Hartlepool Borough Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.