Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Stevenage Borough Council · 2023 rating list

6, ARLINGTON COURT, ARLINGTON BUSINESS PARK, WHITTLE WAY, SG1 2FS

Offices and premises Decided 1 May 2025 CHG101150759 Ryan

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2023 list£106,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£86,000from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 4 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (6 Arlington Court, Arlington Business Park, Whittle Way, Stevenage, SG1 2FS). Every property is listed below.

The 4 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
11 Gateway 1000, Arlington Business Park, Whittle Way, Stevenage, SG1 2FP£34,250—£27,750Allowed in part
12 Gateway 1000, Arlington Business Park, Whittle Way, Stevenage, SG1 2FP£33,500—£27,750Allowed in part
15 Gateway 1000, Arlington Business Park, Whittle Way, Stevenage, SG1 2FP£43,250—£35,000Allowed in part
6 Arlington Court, Arlington Business Park, Whittle Way, Stevenage, SG1 2FSThis appeal£106,000—£86,000Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants sought a reduction in the price per m² from £185 to between £120-£140, arguing that limited rental evidence showed lower values. The tribunal found that only four pieces of rental evidence were available close to the valuation date. The tribunal identified two key rents: 6 Arlington Court (£122-£125 per m² to the break clause, £140 for the full lease) and 10 Gateway 1000 (£183 per m²). The tribunal rejected both the appellant's £120 per m² and the respondent's £175 per m² as unreasonable, determining that £150 per m² was a reasonable price between the lower and higher rental evidence, close to the lease renewal level.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Tripartum Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Valuation method
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
Hearing
3 April 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Stevenage Borough Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.