6, ARLINGTON COURT, ARLINGTON BUSINESS PARK, WHITTLE WAY, SG1 2FS
Offices and premises Decided 1 May 2025 CHG101150759 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester/Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 4 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants sought a reduction in the price per m² from £185 to between £120-£140, arguing that limited rental evidence showed lower values. The tribunal found that only four pieces of rental evidence were available close to the valuation date. The tribunal identified two key rents: 6 Arlington Court (£122-£125 per m² to the break clause, £140 for the full lease) and 10 Gateway 1000 (£183 per m²). The tribunal rejected both the appellant's £120 per m² and the respondent's £175 per m² as unreasonable, determining that £150 per m² was a reasonable price between the lower and higher rental evidence, close to the lease renewal level.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Tripartum Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Valuation method
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
- Hearing
- 3 April 2025
Similar decisions
- 12, GATEWAY 1000, ARLINGTON BUSINESS PARK, WHITTLE WAY, SG1 2FP — Allowed in part, 1 May 2025
- 15, GATEWAY 1000, ARLINGTON BUSINESS PARK, WHITTLE WAY, SG1 2FP — Allowed in part, 1 May 2025
- 11, GATEWAY 1000, ARLINGTON BUSINESS PARK, WHITTLE WAY, SG1 2FP — Allowed in part, 1 May 2025
All decisions in Stevenage Borough Council · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.