Tribunals · Broxbourne Borough Council · 2023 rating list

UNITS 3­-5 TOWER HOUSE, TOWER CENTRE, EN11 8UR

Offices and premises Decided 17 February 2025 CHG101155188 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£52,000£150/m²
Ratepayer sought£36,250
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£52,000£150/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant (through its representative) argued that the rent passing of £36,000 payable under a lease commencing 11 February 2020 demonstrated the rateable value should be reduced to £36,250 (£110/m2). The Valuation Officer relied on comparable rental evidence, particularly 68 High Street which had been rent-reviewed in July 2020 at £186.32/m2, supporting a tone of £150/m2. The tribunal found the subject property's rent unreliable due to absence of information about the rent review terms and what defects the landlord had required the tenant to remedy, and considered the comparable evidence (though not ideal) the best available, supporting the £150/m2 valuation. The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proving the rateable value unreasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Towers Thompson Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
27 January 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Broxbourne Borough Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.