Tribunals · Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council · 2023 rating list

Boundary Mills, Unit 2, S60 5TR

Retail Warehouse and Premises Decided 17 December 2025 CHG101189965 Colliers International - Andrew Stacey

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£1,050,000£85/m²
Ratepayer sought£565,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£910,000£72.5/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value of £1,050,000 (main space rate £85/m2) for a retail warehouse and premises, arguing for a reduction to £565,500 (main space rate £47.50/m2) based on comparable properties. The tribunal found the subject property's passing rent unreliable (being agreed between connected parties) and that most comparable evidence did not assist. However, having regard to the Newcastle Boundary Mills property (assessed at £47.50/m2 after a 27% reduction in the 2023 list), and considering the subject property's superior location and access compared to Newcastle, the tribunal determined a main space rate of £72.50/m2 was fair and reasonable, resulting in a revised rateable value of £910,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Libra Textiles Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson; Simpsons Mall Ltd v Jones
Hearing
17 November 2025

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.