Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council · 2023 rating list

6160 KNIGHTS COURT, SOLIHULL PARKWAY, BIRMINGHAM BUSINESS PARK, BIRMINGHAM BUSINESS PARK, B37 7WY

Offices and premises Decided 24 March 2026 CHG101218228 Ryan

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV · 2023 list£56,000
Ratepayer sought£53,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£53,000from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 4 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (6160 Knights Court, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7WY). Every property is listed below.

The 4 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
6140 Knights Court, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7WY£56,500£53,000£53,000Allowed
6080 Knights Court, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7WY£91,000£85,500£85,500Allowed
6160 Knights Court, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7WYThis appeal£56,000£53,000£53,000Allowed
6150 Knights Court, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7WY£55,000£52,000£52,000Allowed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the £170 per m2 tone applied to four office units at Birmingham Business Park, seeking £160 per m2. The tribunal found that rental evidence from a comparably-sized property (6270 Bishop Court) at £162.11 per m2, combined with the adopted tone of larger properties in the respondent's evidence, which analysed to £172-£202 per m2 but were assessed at £160 per m2, supported the lower rate. The tribunal allowed the appeals and altered the RV's to £160 per m2 with effect from 1 April 2023.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Unielectronics Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
27 February 2026

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.