Tribunals · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council · 2017 rating list

The Ryvita Co Ltd, Old Wareham Road, BH17 7NW

Factory and premises Decided 5 May 2026 CHG101220548 Jones Lang LaSalle

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£645,000£25/m²
Ratepayer sought£575,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£645,000£25/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction in the rateable value from £645,000 (£25/m²) to reflect a proposed value of £22/m² or, alternatively, an increased end allowance from 5% to 10%. The tribunal found that comparison with similar comparable factory properties in the locality, particularly Sterte Avenue which had similarly increased from £20/m² to £25/m² between rating lists, and applying the guidance from Lotus & Delta on tone of list evidence, supported the existing valuation. The tribunal was not persuaded that the percentage increase between lists was determinative, as the 2017 list revaluation was based on different rental evidence from the antecedent valuation date of 1 April 2015, rather than comparison with the 2010 list.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was JORDANS & RYVITA CO LTD, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell; Barnard and Barnard v Walker; Lamb v Go Outdoors Ltd
Hearing
15 April 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.