Tribunals · City of Wolverhampton Council · 2023 rating list

UNIT 3A, SHRUB HILL RETAIL PARK, TALLOW HILL, WR5 1HE

Workshop and premises Decided 19 May 2026 CHG101229305 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£66,500£120/m²
Ratepayer sought£48,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£48,500£87.5/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value of £66,500 (£120/m²), arguing it should be reduced to £48,500 (£87.50/m²). The tribunal found that market conditions at the antecedent valuation date (1 April 2021) were exceptional due to COVID-19 closures, and the original tone did not adequately reflect significant reductions in rental value evident at that time. Comparable evidence, particularly from Unit 7 Shrub Hill (showing a 37.5% reduction from 2017 to 2023 list) and the settlement of Unit C Pheasant Street (reduced from £125/m² to £90/m²), supported the appellant's contention of a substantial downward shift in tone. The tribunal allowed the appeal and reduced the RV to £48,500.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was PSR Trading Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Change of circumstances
covid
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell
Hearing
20 April 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Wolverhampton Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.