Tribunals · Winchester City Council · 2017 rating list

Travelbag Uk Ltd, 23-24 High Street, SO23 9JX

Shop and premises Decided 6 October 2025 CHG101229806 Rabbette Chartered Surveyors

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£128,000£1700/m²
Ratepayer sought£120,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£120,000£1700/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the subject double retail unit in Winchester should receive a 6% end allowance for its width-to-depth ratio (1:0.95) and additional allowance for layout disadvantages from the merger of two units. The Valuation Officer contended that the subject property was a standard unit with no disadvantages and that rental evidence did not support allowances. The tribunal allowed the appeals in part, finding that the width-to-depth ratio was similar to a comparable property (199 High Street, Guildford) which had a 6% allowance, and that the first floor had genuine layout disadvantages due to fragmentation; accordingly, a 6% width-to-depth allowance and 5% line adjustment to the first floor were applied, reducing the RV from £128,000 to £120,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was DNATA TRAVEL, represented.

Grounds argued

  • width to depth ratio
  • Zoning or layout
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
WH Smith v Clee; ArcelorMittal Distribution Solutions Ltd and Lucy Formela-Osbourne
Hearing
11 September 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Winchester City Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.