Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Lewisham · 2023 rating list

32, MONTPELIER VALE, SE3 0TA

Shop and premises Decided 3 June 2026 CHG101265670 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2023 list£55,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£55,000from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (32 Montpelier Vale, London, SE3 0TA). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
12 Montpelier Vale, London, SE3 0TA£35,250—£35,250Dismissed
32 Montpelier Vale, London, SE3 0TAThis appeal£55,000—£55,000Dismissed
23 Tranquil Vale, London, SE3 0BU£38,250—£38,250Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the rateable values of three retail units on the Blackheath high street, seeking a Zone A price of £610 per m2 instead of the adopted £830 per m2. The tribunal found that rental evidence from comparable properties, particularly 14 Montpelier Vale at £813.34 per m2 and 22-24 Montpelier Vale at £852.85 per m2, supported the adopted tone. The tribunal rejected reliance on 18 Tranquil Vale (£610.63 per m2) as potentially not an arm's length transaction and concluded that the appellant failed to demonstrate the adopted price was excessive.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Pets Corner (UK) Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
6 May 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Lewisham · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.