2/6, SWAN LANE, NR2 1JA
Shop and premises Decided 8 May 2026 CHG101275529 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant (Dipple & Son Ltd) challenged the rateable value of a historic retail premises in Norwich, seeking a reduction from £41,500 (zone A rate of £400/m²) to £27,250 (£262.50/m²). The appellant's comparables were located remotely, insufficiently comparable in size/character, or reflected post-AVD pandemic recovery conditions. The tribunal found the Valuation Officer's comparable evidence more persuasive, particularly rental evidence proximate to the AVD from similar properties establishing an established tone of value of £400/m². The appellant failed to discharge the burden of demonstrating the RV was unreasonable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Dipple & Son Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 14 April 2026
Similar decisions
- 142, MERCHANTS HALL, CHAPELFIELD, NR2 1SH — Dismissed, 4 Jul 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.