Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Broxbourne Borough Council · 2017 rating list

GND AND PT 1ST FLR DATUM HOUSE, ESSEX WAY, EN11 0DU

Ground and part 1st floor, Datum House and Eagle House Decided 30 September 2025 CHG101299605 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£89,500
Ratepayer sought£86,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£89,500from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (GND AND PT 1ST FLR, DATUM HOUSE, ESSEX WAY, HODDESDON, HERTFORDSHIRE EN11 0DU). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
GND AND PT 1ST FLR, DATUM HOUSE, ESSEX WAY, HODDESDON, HERTFORDSHIRE EN11 0DUThis appeal£89,500£86,500£89,500Dismissed
EAGLE HOUSE, ESSEX WAY, HODDESDEN, HERTFORDSHRE EN11 0DU£26,750—£26,750Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant (a company owning and occupying two adjacent properties) sought to merge the two separate rating assessments into one, arguing they had previously been rated as one assessment and worked together operationally. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the properties were capable of being let separately, occupied by separate legal entities with separate companies, accounts, directors, websites and contact details, and there was a lease agreement granting exclusive occupation of one property. The tribunal noted there was little evidence supporting the merger and accepted that the separate assessments should remain.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Datum Contracts Hoddesdon Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Split or merge the assessment
Evidence
Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Barr v Manley & Regulus Ltd; Woolway v Mazars; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
3 September 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Broxbourne Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.