Unit 25 Cannock Shopping Centre, Market Hall Street, WS11 1EB
Shop and premises Decided 7 April 2026 CHG101310315 CBRE
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 11 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (UNIT 25 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EB). Every property is listed below.
The 11 properties in this decision
One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.
| Property | Original RV | Sought | Tribunal decided | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNIT 7 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EB | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| UNIT 10 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EB | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| UNIT 12 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EB | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| UNIT 13 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EB | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| UNIT 15 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EB | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| UNIT 20 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EB | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| UNIT 23 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EB | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| UNIT 25 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EBThis appeal | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| UNITS 33-34 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EB | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| UNIT 37 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EB | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| UNIT 46 CANNOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, MARKET HALL STREET, CANNOCK WS11 1EB | — | — | — | Dismissed |
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought reductions to various units at Cannock Shopping Centre, arguing for tone of value at £150 per m2 for some units and £1 per m2 for others, based on challenging rental evidence. The tribunal found the evidence unreliable, noting many lettings were either significantly pre or post-dating the AVD, contained performance-related elements, or high service charges distorting the rating hypothesis. The tribunal accepted the VO's approach using a comparable at £317.91 per m2 and applied a tone of £325 (for superior units) toned back for location, finding no compelling evidence to support the reductions sought and dismissing the appeals.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was SISU CANNOCK LIMITED, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Telereal Trillium v Hewitt; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 9 March 2026
Similar decisions
- THOMPSON TYRE SERVICES LTD ADJ 99A, NORTH STREET, WS11 0AZ — Dismissed, 19 Apr 2023
All decisions in Cannock Chase District Council · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.