Tribunals · Stoke-on-Trent City Council

Unit 4, 12-16 Town Road, ST1 2JQ

Commercial units Decided 24 April 2025 VT00026727

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 6 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant contended that six commercial units were not substantially complete on the date of the completion notice (10 October 2024) and could not reasonably be completed by the proposed completion date of 11 October 2024, citing outstanding works including lack of utility connections, unfinished communal areas, and financial constraints. The tribunal found, based on building control sign-off, photographs from the property letting advert showing substantial completion with only minor cosmetic works outstanding, and applying the London Merchant Securities principle that delays in obtaining approvals are excluded from consideration, that the remaining installations could reasonably be completed by the proposed date assuming continuous works.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Mahwan Properties Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal
Evidence
Photographs, None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
London Merchant Securities plc and Trendworthy Two Ltd v. Islington London Borough Council
Hearing
25 March 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Stoke-on-Trent City Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.