Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, owner of a 20-room 3-star hotel, challenged the rateable value on the basis that the 30% increase from the previous list was excessive and that the Valuation Officer should have considered his business expenses, not just turnover. The Valuation Officer applied the profits method using a Fair Maintainable Trade of £750,000 at a 6% rental bid, arriving at a revised assessment of £45,000. The tribunal accepted that the profits method was the appropriate valuation approach for licensed premises and that the adopted FMT fairly reflected the trade achievable at the property on the antecedent valuation date, allowing the appeal in part from £46,750 to £45,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.
Grounds argued
- Trading receipts (pubs, hotels) · decisive
- Quantum or end allowance
- Evidence
- Trading accounts, Expert report
- Hearing
- 12 September 2019
Similar decisions
- Carreg Llwyd Place, South Street, Rhayader/Brynafon Country House, Nantmel, Rhayader — Dismissed, 11 May 2022
- Hairdressing Salon & Premises, 22 Broad Street, Newtown, Powys SY16 3DS — Dismissed, 14 Apr 2020
- Public House & Premises, White Swan Inn, Llanfrynach, Brecon, LD3 7BZ — Dismissed, 14 Apr 2020
- Club and Premises, Harleys, Bell Lane, Brecon LD3 9EE — Dismissed, 17 Mar 2020
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.