HSBC Bank, 34 Bethcar Street, Ebbw Vale NP23 6HQ
Shop and Premises Decided 22 October 2019 691030299514/541NV17/2 Valuation Tribunal for Wales
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant contended the property should be valued at £8,000 RV (later arguing for £6,000 RV in line with the rent actually paid), down from £12,250 RV, arguing it should be valued as retail premises rather than a bank, and that the tone of comparables on Bethcar Street (particularly larger units at £80–86m2) should apply. The Valuation Officer agreed to reduce the tone from £140m2 to £105m2 and to reclassify the property as shop premises. The tribunal, considering rental evidence from similarly-sized comparable properties on Bethcar Street analysed at £105–111m2, upheld the Valuation Officer's revised valuation of £8,500 RV, finding it fair and reasonable and in line with comparable evidence, although lower than the original list entry.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was HSBC Bank, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Floor area or measurement
- Zoning or layout
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 24 September 2019
Similar decisions
- 89 Commercial Street, Tredegar NP22 3DH — Dismissed, 4 Oct 2019
- Shop & Premises, 86-87 Commercial Street, Tredegar NP22 3DN — Dismissed, 7 Mar 2019
- Shop and Premises, 77 Bethcar Street, Ebbw Vale NP23 6HN — Dismissed, 7 Mar 2019
- Shop & Premises, 29/30 Church Street, Abertillery NP13 1DB — Dismissed, 7 Mar 2019
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.