Free news & data alerts
Tribunals · Wales · Merthyr Tydfil · 2017 rating list

Shop and Premises, Unit 3 Swansea Road, Merthyr Tydfil CF48 1HT

Shop and Premises Decided 27 July 2021 692533254900/285NV17/57 Valuation Tribunal for Wales

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£17,750
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£17,750from 21 Apr 2018

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 4 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Shop and Premises, Unit 3 Swansea Road, Merthyr Tydfil CF48 1HT). Every property is listed below.

The 4 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Shop and Premises, Unit 3 Swansea Road, Merthyr Tydfil CF48 1HTThis appeal£17,750—£17,750Dismissed
Shop and Premises, Unit 5 Swansea Road, Merthyr Tydfil CF48 1HT£17,750—£17,750Dismissed
Shop and Premises, Unit 8 Swansea Road, Merthyr Tydfil CF48 1HT£13,750—£13,750Dismissed
Shop and Premises, Unit 9 Swansea Road, Merthyr Tydfil CF48 1HT£14,000—£14,000Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued that the units should be valued using Net Internal Area (NIA) with zoning rather than Gross Internal Area (GIA), and that the tone per m² of £450 was too high. The Tribunal found that GIA is the nationally adopted basis for out-of-town retail parks, supported by comparable evidence at Cyfarthfa Retail Park and McArthur Glen, and that the rental information and settled comparables established an appropriate tone. The Tribunal concluded the appellants failed to discharge their burden of proof.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Floor area or measurement
  • Zoning or layout
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Vines Ltd v de Mauny; Ladies Hosiery and Underwear Ltd v West Middlesex AC
Hearing
29 June 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in Merthyr Tydfil ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Read it on valuationtribunalwales.net

Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.