Land Used For Storage and Premises, Copart, Prince William Avenue, Sandycroft, Deeside, CH5
Land used for storage and premises Decided 20 October 2025 6835101281376/285NV23 Valuation Tribunal for Wales Ryan
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, representing the owner-occupier of a large storage property of 118,000m², argued that the rateable value should be reduced from £241,000 (unit rate £1.60) to £170,000 (unit rate £1.00), contending that the unit rate should be lower given the property's status as the largest assessment in the local rating scheme, and citing a comparable property with a lower unit rate. The Valuation Officer countered that the comparable properties within the local scheme were smaller or had significantly less hard-surfaced land, and provided extensive national comparable evidence demonstrating that similar properties were valued at significantly higher unit rates, with a 25% general uplift justified between rating lists. The tribunal accepted the Valuation Officer's evidence and dismissed the appeal, finding that the unit rate of £1.60 was fair and reasonable and consistent with national valuation trends for large storage properties.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Copart UK Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Quantum or end allowance
- Evidence
- Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Ladies Hosiery and Underwear Limited v West Middlesex AC; Fir Mill Limited v Royston UDC; Lamb v Minards; Barnard & Barnard v Walker; Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; K Shoe Shops Limited v Hardy; Morton v Synor Electronics; Shearson Lehman Brothers Limited v Humphreys; Irving Brown and Daughter v Smith; Jafton Properties Ltd v Prisk; Williams v Scottish Newcastle Retail Limited; Telereal Trillium v Hewitt; Lamb v Go Outdoors Limited; Bunyan v Acenden Limited; Stena Line Limited v VO; Barclays bank PLC Poundland Limited v Jo Moore
- Hearing
- 18 September 2025
Similar decisions
- Factory and Premises, Maes Gwern, Wrexham Road, Mold, CH7 1XW — Dismissed, 18 Jun 2026
- Factory and Premises, Aber Roof Truss Ltd, Engineer Park Industrial Estate, Sandycroft, Deeside CH5 2QD — Dismissed, 22 May 2025
- Factory & Premises, Laybond Products Ltd, Riverside Industrial Estate, River Lane, Saltney, Chester CH4 8RS — Dismissed, 21 Jun 2019
- Warehouse & Premises, Unit 4, Kings Court, Sandycroft, Deeside CH5 2FG — Dismissed, 15 May 2019
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.