Tribunals · London Borough of Hackney · 2010 rating list

North End International Broadcast Centre, Olympic Park, E20 2ST

TV studio and premises Decided 9 July 2021 24208266 Colliers International - Rating

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£675,000
Ratepayer sought£166,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£675,000from 29 Jul 2013

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

BT Plc appealed against the RV of £675,000 for a tv studio at the Olympic Park, seeking a reduction to £166,000. The tribunal found that while the actual rent of £1,487,385 pa (later £1,834,069 pa) required substantial adjustment to conform to the rating hypothesis, it carried weight as the property was sui generis with sparse comparable evidence. The tribunal rejected the appellant's arguments for surplusage allowance, lack of natural light adjustment, and locality unfitness allowance. The tribunal concluded the VO's valuation of £675,000 was not excessive having regard to the actual rent and the reasonable application of comparable warehouse values in the absence of direct studio comparables.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was BT Plc.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
  • Quantum or end allowance
  • Other
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Expert report
Cases cited
Scottish & Newcastle Retail Ltd and Another v Williams (VO); Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
30 June 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Hackney · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.