Tribunals · London Borough of Hackney · 2017 rating list

146 Clapton Common, E5 9AG

Hotel and premises Decided 5 May 2021 CHG100017691 JMA Chartered Surveyors

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought£70,000
VO conceded first£127,000
Tribunal decided£70,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the rental comparison method used by the VO was inappropriate due to insufficient reliable rental evidence for small independent hotels in the locality, and that a shortened profits method based on trading accounts was more suitable. The tribunal found the VO's rental evidence to be of very limited assistance, being historic and questionable in nature, and therefore accepted the appellant's receipts and expenditure approach. The tribunal determined that the fair maintainable trade figures were reasonable and the percentage rates adopted to establish rental bids were appropriate, resulting in rateable values of £70,000 for Kent Hall Hotel and £35,750 for Kadimah Carmel Hotel.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Valuation method
  • Trading receipts (pubs, hotels)
Evidence
Rents, Trading accounts, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
14 April 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Hackney · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.