Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Waltham Forest · 2010 rating list

Land Adj. Unit 5, Cork Tree Way Hall Lane, London, London, E4 8JA

Car Park and Premises / Workshop and Premises / Car Showroom and Premises Decided 24 March 2021 25030410 Autohouse Associates

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2010 list£4,400
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£4,400from 1 Apr 2010

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2010 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Land adj Unit 5 Cork Tree Way, Hall Lane, London E4 8JA). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2010 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Land adj Unit 5 Cork Tree Way, Hall Lane, London E4 8JAThis appeal£4,400—£4,400Dismissed
Rear pt Unit 5 Cork Tree, Hall Lane, London£78,500—£78,500Dismissed
Unit 6 Cork Tree Way, Hall Lane, London£170,000—£170,000Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to merge three separate hereditaments (car park, workshop, and showroom) into a single assessment at £225,000 RV, as had been determined in an earlier tribunal decision. The appellant argued the properties met the contiguity conditions under the Rating (Property in Common Occupation) and Council Tax (Empty Dwellings) Act 2018, contending they formed a functional unit despite being separated by service roads. The tribunal found the three hereditaments were not contiguous under either the Mazars test or the statutory definition in section 64(3ZD), as they were separated by service/public access roads with no internal access between them, and therefore should remain as three separate assessments.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Group 1 Automotive, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Split or merge the assessment · decisive
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Woolway v Mazars LLP; J Evans v RLM Packaging Ltd
Hearing
25 February 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Waltham Forest · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.