Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Waltham Forest · 2010 rating list

Rear Pt Unit 5, Cork Tree Way Hall Lane, London, London, E4 8JA

Car Park and Premises; Workshop and Premises; Car Showroom and Premises Decided 24 March 2021 26374500 Autohouse Associates

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2010 list£78,500
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£78,500from 1 Apr 2010

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2010 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Rear pt Unit 5 Cork Tree, Hall Lane, London). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2010 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Land adj Unit 5 Cork Tree Way, Hall Lane, London E4 8JA£4,400—£4,400Dismissed
Rear pt Unit 5 Cork Tree, Hall Lane, LondonThis appeal£78,500—£78,500Dismissed
Unit 6 Cork Tree Way, Hall Lane, London£170,000—£170,000Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to merge three separate hereditaments (land adj Unit 5, rear part Unit 5, and Unit 6 Cork Tree Way) into a single assessment at £225,000 RV, relying on claimed functional connection as a franchised car dealership and on the Rating (Property in Common Occupation) Act 2018. The tribunal found that the three units were not contiguous as required—they were separated by service/public access roads and not directly intercommunicating. Applying the Supreme Court's test in Mazars and section 64(3ZD), the tribunal concluded the statutory contiguity condition was not met and the appeals were dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Group 1 Automotive, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Split or merge the assessment · decisive
Cases cited
Woolway (VO) v Mazars LLP [2015] UKSC 53; J Evans (VO) v RLM Packaging Ltd [2003]
Hearing
25 February 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Waltham Forest · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.