Cashpoint At 22, Glasshouse Lane, EX2 7BR
Automatic Teller Machine Decided 24 May 2022 25544488 Johnson Fellows
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
This appeal concerned an Automatic Teller Machine and was one of several hundred similar appeals that had been stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following that judgment and a list maintenance exercise by the Valuation Officer, this appeal was considered redundant as multiple appeals had been lodged against the same list entry. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant did not attend, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Other
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Similar decisions
- Atm At 34/35, Guildhall Shopping Centre, EX4 3HL — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.