Atm At 34/35, Guildhall Shopping Centre, EX4 3HL
Decided 24 May 2022 25773931 CBRE - London
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
An ATM-related appeal was dismissed as redundant following the Supreme Court judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes. The appellant did not appear, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case. The Valuation Officer had undertaken list maintenance and identified this appeal as redundant following the lifting of the stay on ATM-related appeals.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Similar decisions
- Cashpoint At 22, Glasshouse Lane, EX2 7BR — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.