36-38 Tynemouth Road, Tyne And Wear, Tyne And Wear, NE28 0LF
Decided 3 March 2023 28596911 S J Associates
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to lodge a statement of case and did not attend the hearing or provide representation. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer regarding the rateable value entry in the 2010 non-domestic rating list. The tribunal was satisfied that the entry was correct given the appellant's procedural failure to disclose arguments and absence of substantive challenge.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- UNIT 4/5, PARK VIEW SHOPPING CENTRE,, NE26 1DG — Dismissed, 31 Dec 2025
- UNIT 12, ALDER ROAD, WEST CHIRTON INDUSTRIAL ESTATE NORTH, NE29 8DX — Dismissed, 23 Jul 2025
- The Dome, Spanish City, NE26 1AR — Dismissed, 14 Apr 2025
- Sofology, Unit 4, NE28 9PD — Dismissed, 19 Mar 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.