Tribunals · North Tyneside Council · 2017 rating list

Sofology, Unit 4, NE28 9PD

Retail warehouse and premises Decided 19 March 2024 CHG100691169 Lambert Smith Hampton - M Oates

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£325,000£350/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£325,000£300/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction in the main space rate from £350/m² to £275/m², arguing that analysis of the subject rents (adjusted for rent-free periods and capital contributions) supported this rate. The tribunal preferred the Valuation Officer's approach of averaging the rent-free period over the full 10-year lease term rather than the appellant's 5-year approach, which produced analysed rents supporting approximately £300/m² when averaged. The tribunal found the current assessment of £300/m² was not unreasonable and supported by comparable Unit 1 at £350/m², and dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Sofology Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Change of circumstances
roadworks
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
20 February 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in North Tyneside Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.