Hair And Beauty By Regis At Tesco, Clifton Road, FY4 4US
Decided 3 March 2023 30591522 Allsop LLP
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to comply with the Tribunal's standard directions regarding disclosure of statements of case and did not attend or submit any substantive argument at the hearing. The Tribunal found that the entry in the 2010 rating list was correct and dismissed the appeal given the absence of any case to answer on the merits.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal · decisive
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- 11-13 Whitegate Drive, FY3 9AE — Allowed in part, 7 Nov 2024
- Carousel, 147-157 Promenade, FY1 5BE — Dismissed, 26 May 2023
- Pleasure Beach Main Car Park, Pleasure Beach Main Car Park, FY4 1HW — Allowed in part, 13 Apr 2023
- Silcocks Leisure Group, 125-141 Promenade, FY1 5BE — Dismissed, 19 Nov 2021
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.