Supermarket Dentist At Tesco, Riverfield Drive, MK41 0SF
Decided 21 March 2023 30805739 Colliers International - Rating
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to attend the hearing and did not submit a statement of case. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer and sought dismissal. The tribunal, finding no substantive argument disputing the rateable value and given the appellant's failure to comply with procedural directions, dismissed the appeal and found the entry in the 2010 rating list to be correct.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- Kings House, 245 Ampthill Road, MK42 9AZ — Allowed in part, 29 Jun 2026
- UNIT 1 TEREK HOUSE, SANDPIPER COURT, PHOENIX PARK, EATON SOCON, PE19 8EP — Dismissed, 23 Dec 2025
- UNIT 2, INTERCHANGE RETAIL PARK, RACE MEADOWS WAY, MK42 7AZ — Allowed in part, 15 Apr 2025
- Charles Wells, Havelock Street, Havelock Street, Havelock Street, MK40 4JL — Allowed, 31 Mar 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.