Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Sheffield City Council · 2010 rating list

1St Fl Wynstay House 148, Bradfield Road, S6 2BW

Offices and premises Decided 21 June 2022 34074152 Martin Reifer

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2010 list—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2010 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (1st Floor Wynstay House, 148 Bradfield Road, Sheffield, S6 2BW). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2010 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
1st Floor Wynstay House, 148 Bradfield Road, Sheffield, S6 2BWThis appeal———Dismissed
2nd Floor Wynstay House, 148 Bradfield Road, Sheffield, S6 2BW———Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to challenge an invalidity notice by proposing alteration to the 2010 rating list with effective dates of June 2013, claiming the properties should have been deleted or reduced to nil rateable value. The tribunal found that such proposals could only be validly made under the PICO Act where they resulted from Mazars-related hereditament mergers, and only before 1 January 2020. The subject properties were already separate entries and not the result of Mazars splits, and the appellant had the opportunity to make such proposals during the list's operation or within statutory time limits. The proposal dated February 2020 was therefore out of time and invalid.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was JLL Investments Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal
  • Split or merge the assessment
  • Effective date
Cases cited
Woolway (VO) v Mazars LLP [2015] UKSC 53; Newbigin (VO) v Monk [2017] UKSC 14; Stormhill Properties Limited v Roberts (VO) [2022] UKUT 109 (LC)
Hearing
26 May 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Sheffield City Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.