Tribunals · London Borough of Islington · 2017 rating list

42,, UPPER STREET,, N1 0PN

Shop and Premises Decided 10 December 2020 CHG100060078 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£127,000£2100/m²
Ratepayer sought£97,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£127,000£2100/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the rateable value should be reduced to £97,000 based on rental evidence from the subject property (£1,659/m² ITZA) and a comparable property at 40 Upper Street, proposing a base rate of £1,600/m² ITZA. The tribunal found that the comparable property evidence from 29 Upper Street and 23-24 Upper Street, both closer to the antecedent valuation date of 1 April 2015, supported higher rates of £2,003/m² and £2,460/m² ITZA respectively. The tribunal determined that the adopted rate of £2,100/m² ITZA was fair and reasonable, and dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Flight Centre UK Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
30 November 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Islington · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.