Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council · 2017 rating list

4, SHELDON WAY, LARKFIELD,, me20 6se

Warehouse and premises Decided 7 January 2021 CHG100105008 Ryan

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV · 2017 list£115,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£107,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 4 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Unit 4, Sheldon Way, Larkfield, Aylesford, Kent ME20 6SE). Every property is listed below.

The 4 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Unit 4, Sheldon Way, Larkfield, Aylesford, Kent ME20 6SEThis appeal£115,000—£107,000Allowed
Unit 6, Sheldon Way, Larkfield, Aylesford, Kent ME20 6SE£137,000—£128,000Allowed
Unit 7, Sheldon Way, Larkfield, Aylesford, Kent ME20 6SE£186,000—£174,000Allowed
Unit 12, Sheldon Way, Larkfield, Aylesford, Kent ME20 6SE£118,000—£110,000Allowed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the rateable value should be reduced based on rental evidence from Unit 4 analysed at £56.00/m2, which was closer to the antecedent valuation date and was a new letting. The tribunal found that the appellant's rental evidence for the subject property was the best evidence available, being directly from the property being valued and the closest to the valuation date. The tribunal was not persuaded that the valuation officer's comparable evidence from other locations in different valuation schemes with different ages and sizes was sufficiently comparable to support the existing £60.00/m2 valuation.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was B and W Engineering Services Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, comparables
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
8 December 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.