GLoden Ltd, 135 Whiteladies Road, BS8 2PL
Shop and premises Decided 12 February 2021 CHG100115773 Colliers International - Daniel Johnstone
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the rateable value was too high, relying on rental evidence from nearby properties and contending that the VO's comparable properties were not truly comparable. The tribunal found that the appellant's proposed rate of £370/m² was too low, but accepted that the original £470/m² was too high. The tribunal determined the zone A rate should be £401/m², derived from analysing the 2016 rent of the appeal property itself, as this reasonably reflected the property's location between the main shopping area and residential zone with reduced footfall.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Gloden Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, tone_of_list_comparables, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 15 January 2021
Similar decisions
- Unit 1A And 1B, Eastgate Centre, BS5 6XX — Dismissed, 10 Mar 2026
- 33A Broadmead Gallery, Broadmead, BS1 3XB — Dismissed, 14 Jun 2024
- UNIT G8, UNION GALLERY, BROADMEAD, BS1 3XD — Allowed in part, 3 Apr 2023
- The Range Home & Leisure, Units 7+8 Avonmeads, St Phillips Causeway, St Phillips Causeway, BS2 0SP — Dismissed, 12 Dec 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.