Alex Oneil, 341-343 Roman Road, E3 5QR
Shop and premises (estate agent) Decided 8 June 2022 CHG100140236 JMA Chartered Surveyors
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued the passing rent of £25,500 (as revised on 23 March 2016 from the original £24,500) should be the starting point for valuation, and that the VO's comparable evidence from much smaller properties was not directly comparable and appeared inflated by small business rate relief. The tribunal found the passing rent provided good evidence of what a hypothetical tenant would pay, particularly as the property occupied an unusual isolated location at the end of the parade, and accepted that the VO had not presented sufficiently verified comparable evidence to reject the actual rent. The appeal was allowed and the RV reduced from £33,750 to £25,500.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Hillgate Investments Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 19 May 2022
Similar decisions
- 4 Heneage Street, E1 5LJ — Dismissed, 18 Jun 2025
- 349, ROMAN ROAD, E3 5QR — Dismissed, 16 Jan 2024
- 349, ROMAN ROAD, E3 5QR — Dismissed, 16 Jan 2024
- GND FL Right, 132 Commercial Street, E1 6NF — Allowed, 9 Feb 2023
All decisions in London Borough of Tower Hamlets · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.