4 Heneage Street, E1 5LJ
Shop and premises Decided 18 June 2025 CHG101113754
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought reduction of the rateable value from £16,500 to £12,000, relying on assured shorthold tenancy agreements showing lower rental payments. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the tenancy agreements were residential, not commercial leases, and therefore inapplicable to the commercial property. The tribunal instead gave weight to comparable rental evidence from 1 Brady Street (£640.20/m²) and 60 Cleveland Way (£441.90/m²), both of which supported a Zone A rate of £400/m², and tonal evidence from similar shops on Heneage Street, all confirming the original valuation was reasonable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 19 May 2025
Similar decisions
- 349, ROMAN ROAD, E3 5QR — Dismissed, 16 Jan 2024
- 349, ROMAN ROAD, E3 5QR — Dismissed, 16 Jan 2024
- GND FL Right, 132 Commercial Street, E1 6NF — Allowed, 9 Feb 2023
- Alex Oneil, 341-343 Roman Road, E3 5QR — Allowed, 8 Jun 2022
All decisions in London Borough of Tower Hamlets · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.