Tribunals · Slough Borough Council · 2017 rating list

Unit 7, Langley Business Centre, SL3 8DS

Warehouse and premises Decided 24 February 2022 CHG100143340 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£226,000
Ratepayer sought£151,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£226,000£82.5/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the semi-detached warehouse was built in the 1950s-60s and should be valued in an older valuation scheme, proposing an RV of £151,000. The tribunal found the hereditament was constructed in 1985 based on approved planning permission for demolition and reconstruction, physical attributes, and other evidence, and was correctly valued in the 1980s scheme at £82.50 per m². The tribunal placed limited weight on the subject lease rent due to adjustments required for the rating hypothesis and insufficient comparable evidence to support a reduction, therefore dismissing the appeal and confirming the RV at £226,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Pinewood MBS Lighting, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Floor area or measurement
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
28 January 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Slough Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.