Tribunals · East Staffordshire Borough Council · 2017 rating list

10 The Maltings, ST14 7LN

Shop and premises Decided 9 August 2021 CHG100144782 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£8,700£180/m²
Ratepayer sought£5,200
VO conceded first£8,000−8% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£8,000£165/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the zone A price of £165/m² was excessive, relying on rental evidence from 42 High Street (£111.25/m²) and the vacant state of The Maltings shopping centre (80% occupied). The Valuation Officer relied on the passing rent at 28-30 The Maltings (£173.07/m² reduced to £165/m² to account for differences) and comparable properties supporting £165/m². The tribunal found the Valuation Officer's comparable (28-30 The Maltings) was an open market transaction and properly supported the zone A price of £165/m², that any vacancy reduction required specific grounds not shown here, and that the appellant had failed to demonstrate the RV was unreasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was MJ Barrett Group, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
26 July 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in East Staffordshire Borough Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.