Tribunals · East Staffordshire Borough Council · 2023 rating list

4 Carters Square, ST14 7FN

Shop and Premises Decided 8 April 2026 CHG101387223

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£24,500£260/m²
Ratepayer sought£14,750
VO conceded first£20,500−16% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£20,500£215/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, a coffee shop owner, challenged the rateable value of £24,500 based on a Zone A rate of £260 psm, proposing £14,750 (£150 psm). The Valuation Officer had already reduced it to £20,500 (£215 psm). The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the subject property's rent from a new lease effective May 2021 was the best evidence, supporting the £215 psm Zone A rate. The tribunal rejected the appellant's arguments regarding comparables outside the immediate locality and current vacant properties (which were post the material day of 1 April 2023), and confirmed that features like air-conditioning and customer toilets were appropriately valued in line with other local assessments.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
23 March 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in East Staffordshire Borough Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.