32-38 Lexham Gardens, W8 5JE
Self-catering holiday unit and premises Decided 28 April 2022 CHG100151518 JMA Chartered Surveyors
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a significant reduction in the RV based on an alternative valuation of £166,800 (from £950,000), arguing for £3,500-£10,000 per bed space and comparing to Knaresborough Place. The tribunal found the rental evidence on the subject property and FMT analysis were the starting points under Lotus and Delta authority. The appellant's comparable property analysis was not sufficiently reliable. The tribunal allowed the appeal in part by adopting a 5% end allowance for poor interconnection between the two former dwellings (reducing from £900,000 to £855,000 for 1 April 2017), which the VO had conceded. The MCC appeal was dismissed as the £550,000 RV for the remaining space was not unreasonable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Lexham Properties Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Valuation method
- Quantum or end allowance
- Change of circumstances
- water damage
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 12 April 2022
Similar decisions
- Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD — Allowed, 3 Mar 2026
- Caraffini, 61-63 Lower Sloane Street, SW1W 8DH — Dismissed, 7 Jul 2025
- 264, BROMPTON ROAD, SW3 2AS — Dismissed, 15 Jul 2024
- Bst - Gnd Flrs 282-292 Westbourne Grove, W11 2PS — Dismissed, 1 Mar 2024
All decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.