Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

PT 4TH FLR 10, QUEEN STREET PLACE, EC4R 1BE

Offices and premises Decided 17 November 2025 CHG100171839 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester/Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£735,000£350/m²
Ratepayer sought£685,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£735,000£350/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, a media and financial information company, sought to reduce the RV from £735,000 to £685,000 (initially to £585,000), arguing that the rate per m2 of £350 was excessive compared to comparable properties in the City of London. The tribunal found that the rent on the appeal property itself, analysing to £355.71/m2, was the best evidence and supported the current valuation when adjusted for fit-out costs. The tribunal accepted comparable properties within the same building but rejected external comparables as either in different localities or less recently refurbished, finding the £350/m2 rate reasonable in accordance with Lotus and Delta v Culverwell principles.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was MERGERMARKET T/A ACURIS GROUP, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson; Robert Dyas Holdings Ltd v Moore
Hearing
27 October 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.