Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Woking Borough Council · 2017 rating list

68, CHERTSEY ROAD, GU21 5BJ

Office and premises Decided 24 May 2023 CHG100388481 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Gnd – 1st Flr, 68 Chertsey Road, Woking GU21 5BJ). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Gnd – 1st Flr, 68 Chertsey Road, Woking GU21 5BJThis appeal———Dismissed
2nd Flr, 68 Chertsey Road, Woking GU21 5BJ———Dismissed
3rd - 7th floors, 68 Chertsey Road, Woking GU21 5BJ———Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the validity of the completion notice on three grounds: that it was ambiguous, that it was issued before substantial completion was reached (contrary to statute and case law for speculative developments), and that the completion date was irrational given the property's condition. The tribunal found the completion notice was clear, that the case law cited did not definitively bar a completion notice before substantial completion, and that the irrational date argument was effectively a challenge to the date itself which could only be pursued via formal appeal procedures. The appeals were therefore dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Royal London, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal
Evidence
Expert report, Measurement survey
Cases cited
Graylaw investments v Ipswich BC; London Merchant Securities Plc v Islington LBC; Porter v Gladman Sipps; R (Reeves) v VTE; Delph Property Group Ltd v Alexander; Hermes Property Unit Trust v Roberts; Newham London Borough Council v Rad Phase 1 Type B Property Company No 1 Limited; Henderson v Liverpool Metropolitan District Council; Provincial Real Estate Burton Ltd v Virk and East Staffordshire Borough Council
Hearing
27 April 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in Woking Borough Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.