3 RD 7TH FLRS 68, CHERTSEY ROAD, GU21 5BJ
Office and retail premises Decided 24 May 2023 CHG100388488 Ryan
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (68 Chertsey Road, Woking, GU21 5BJ). Every property is listed below.
The 3 properties in this decision
One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.
| Property | Original RV | Sought | Tribunal decided | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gnd – 1st Flr, 68 Chertsey Road, Woking GU21 5BJ | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| 3rd - 7th floors, 68 Chertsey Road, Woking GU21 5BJ | — | — | — | Dismissed |
| 68 Chertsey Road, Woking, GU21 5BJThis appeal | — | — | — | Dismissed |
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the validity of the completion notice issued by the billing authority on three grounds: that it was ambiguous regarding which statutory provision it was issued under; that it was served before the property reached substantial completion; and that the reasoning for the completion date was irrational. The tribunal found the completion notice was clear, adequately identified the building and completion date as required by statute, and found no statutory bar to issuing a completion notice before substantial completion. The tribunal also found the irrationality argument was in substance a challenge to the completion date itself, which could only be pursued via a formal appeal under Schedule 4A. Accordingly, the tribunal dismissed the appeals and upheld the entries in the rating list.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Royal London, represented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal · decisive
- Cases cited
- Graylaw investments v Ipswich BC; London Merchant Securities Plc v Islington LBC; Porter (VO) v Gladman Sipps; R (Reeves) v VTE; Delph Property Group Ltd v Alexander (VO); Hermes Property Unit Trust v Roberts (VO); Newham London Borough Council v Rad Phase 1 Type B Property Company No 1 Limited; Henderson v Liverpool Metropolitan District Council
- Hearing
- 27 April 2023
Similar decisions
- 68, CHERTSEY ROAD, GU21 5BJ — Dismissed, 24 May 2023
- GND - 1ST FLR 68, CHERTSEY ROAD, GU21 5BJ — Dismissed, 24 May 2023
- 3rd Flr Hollywood House, Church Street East, GU21 6HA — Dismissed, 4 Aug 2021
All decisions in Woking Borough Council · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.