Tribunals · London Borough of Southwark · 2017 rating list

338-339, Shopping Centre, Elephant & Castle, Elephant & Castle, SE1 6TB

Shop and premises Decided 17 October 2022 CHG100392690 GL Hearn Limited - Star 2017

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£104,000£500/m²
Ratepayer sought£74,500
VO conceded first£87,000−16% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£87,000£500/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, a Clarks factory outlet shoe shop, argued the assessment of £500/m² was excessive and should be reduced to £425/m² based on the passing rent of £75,000 (reviewed in 2014 with nil increase). The tribunal found the passing rent was a good starting point but comprised a rent review with limited weight. The tribunal considered comparable rental evidence and found the Valuation Officer's comparables (particularly Unit 311 Price Buster at £605/m² and Unit 305 Price Buster at £532/m²) more persuasive as new lettings closer to the valuation date, and found £500/m² supported by the evidence, dismissing the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was C & J Clark Properties Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
20 September 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Southwark · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.