Tribunals · London Borough of Southwark · 2017 rating list

Unit 6 (Retail Unit A) The Shard Tower, London Bridge Station, SE1 9BR

Shop and premises; café and premises Decided 26 August 2025 CHG101097741 Newmark Gerald Eve LLP

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£285,000£10000/m²
Ratepayer sought£186,000
VO conceded first£272,500−4% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£186,000£6500/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the RV of £285,000 (reduced to £272,500 at Challenge stage) for a coffee shop at London Bridge Station, arguing it was excessive. The appellant's surveyor presented rental evidence from the subject property's July 2015 rent review, which showed a nil increase to £200,000 per annum (£6,975 per m²), together with evidence from comparable units on the same concourse affected by station redevelopment. The tribunal accepted the rental evidence from the subject property as most reliable being close to the AVD, and found that comparable unit evidence and the impact of the 2016 redevelopment diverting footfall supported the appellant's proposed £6,500 per m² (£186,000 RV), reducing from the assessed £9,500 per m².

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Nero Holdings Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson; SSP v Ricketts 2022
Hearing
29 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Southwark · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.