Boston Tea Party, 293 Gloucester Road, BS7 8PE
Shop and premises Decided 10 March 2022 CHG100407898 Cluttons - Michael Charles Hampton Riddington
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the RV of £53,500 (at £350/m²) arguing for £33,000 (at £250/m²) based on rental evidence, claiming a larger hard frontage allowance and lower relativity for the masked retail area. The tribunal accepted the Valuation Officer's zone A rate of £340/m² supported by rental comparables on Gloucester Road (286, 274, and 264 Gloucester Road) and upheld the 7.5% hard frontage allowance. However, the tribunal agreed the masked retail area behind a solid wall should be valued at A/10 relativity rather than A/8, reducing the overall assessment to £41,500 RV.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Boston Tea Party, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Quantum or end allowance
- Zoning or layout
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 11 February 2022
Similar decisions
- Unit 1A And 1B, Eastgate Centre, BS5 6XX — Dismissed, 10 Mar 2026
- 33A Broadmead Gallery, Broadmead, BS1 3XB — Dismissed, 14 Jun 2024
- UNIT G8, UNION GALLERY, BROADMEAD, BS1 3XD — Allowed in part, 3 Apr 2023
- The Range Home & Leisure, Units 7+8 Avonmeads, St Phillips Causeway, St Phillips Causeway, BS2 0SP — Dismissed, 12 Dec 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.