Pt Gnd Flr 20 Old Bailey, EC4M 7AN
Office and Premises Decided 31 July 2025 CHG100547666 Knight Frank - Bjorn Bowles
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 12 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants challenged the rateable values of multiple office units at 20 Old Bailey, London, arguing the existing base rate of £525 psm was unreasonable based on comparable properties and rental evidence. The tribunal examined rental evidence from the subject building and comparable properties (10 Old Bailey valued at £480 psm and 60 Ludgate Hill at £550 psm), and agreed the original RVs were unreasonable. The tribunal determined a base rate of £500 psm was appropriate, reflecting the subject property as superior to 10 Old Bailey but inferior to 60 Ludgate Hill, and allowing for the partial refurbishment with new façade on the Old Bailey side only and reduced natural light at the Fleet Place entrance.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Metro Bank plc, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Dawn Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Limited [2023] UKUT 17 (LC); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC); Denton v TH White Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 906
- Hearing
- 1 July 2025
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.